i'm really confused by this picture because i've seen her other shots and although she's not my fave indian girl, they really ruined her here! I'm really disappointed that they left a shadow under her nose which is not flattering for any girl!!! (think charlie chaplin or hitler!) sooooo disappointed.....
this is the best, most modern she has ever looked! They retained her ethnic features, and captured an androgyny in her here. I also love she still has cheekbones without having sullen cheeks...which has been the look for awhile. Looking at her other pictures: the styling and makeup; they usually make her look cheap, but here her look is provoking a certain intelligence.
besides, isn't it common knowledge Vogue is known for their bad edits and retouching?
she looks BAd & that's the truth. i stopped liking her after i read a quote from her bragging that indian models are the most beautiful women in the world and that no one can compare to them or something like that. she sounded way too concieted. just cuz she is a big model in india doesn't mean she'll be big everywhere.i hope she learns it.
its very 'tea with mussolini'.she looks very gothic for a change.good job chloe.had the stylist been indian,im sure he/she would have either made her look like a porn star in a bikini or stuffed her in some kitschy manish arora costume with multicoloured balloons/bangles and the like.yes those are the 2 indian high fashion looks for you, cheap trashy paris hilton look alike or space monkey from bollywood.take your pick
They should have done something with her hair. Her face looks burnt and does not match her body's complexion. Nonetheless, we are used to seeing "perfect" photo-edited models, so this is a change and back to reality!
Model: Monikangana Dutta (IMG-Paris)
i'm really confused by this picture because i've seen her other shots and although she's not my fave indian girl, they really ruined her here! I'm really disappointed that they left a shadow under her nose which is not flattering for any girl!!! (think charlie chaplin or hitler!) sooooo disappointed.....
ReplyDeleteThis would look so much better if it went through the Vogue photo editing expertise.
ReplyDeletethis is the best, most modern she has ever looked!
ReplyDeleteThey retained her ethnic features, and captured an androgyny in her here. I also love she still has cheekbones without having sullen cheeks...which has been the look for awhile. Looking at her other pictures: the styling and makeup; they usually make her look cheap, but here her look is provoking a certain intelligence.
besides, isn't it common knowledge Vogue is known for their bad edits and retouching?
she looks BAd & that's the truth. i stopped liking her after i read a quote from her bragging that indian models are the most beautiful women in the world and that no one can compare to them or something like that. she sounded way too concieted. just cuz she is a big model in india doesn't mean she'll be big everywhere.i hope she learns it.
ReplyDeleteshe should hang out more often with her indian counterpart lakshmi menon who definitely seems to have a good head on her shoulders.
ReplyDeletemost models look bad by everyday standards.
ReplyDeletecouldn't find her portfolio in IMG's site?
ReplyDeleteShe's signed with IMG-Paris under the Development category for new models.
ReplyDeleteand under the name Kangana
ReplyDeleteits very 'tea with mussolini'.she looks very gothic for a change.good job chloe.had the stylist been indian,im sure he/she would have either made her look like a porn star in a bikini or stuffed her in some kitschy manish arora costume with multicoloured balloons/bangles and the like.yes those are the 2 indian high fashion looks for you, cheap trashy paris hilton look alike or space monkey from bollywood.take your pick
ReplyDeleteThey should have done something with her hair. Her face looks burnt and does not match her body's complexion. Nonetheless, we are used to seeing "perfect" photo-edited models, so this is a change and back to reality!
ReplyDelete